Study : Brain areas choose to find information about bad possibilities. Researchers at the Washington University School of Medicine have found brain regions involved in selecting whether they will detect when a malignant event is about to occur.
These findings, published in the journal Neuron, define ‘doomscrolling’ as the practice of persistent bad news on social media and read all the disturbing news that emerges, a practice that unfortunately seems common during the Covid-19 epidemic.
Our brain biology can play a role in that. Investigators from the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Louis have identified areas and cells in the brain that are activated when a person is faced with choosing to read or hide information about an unwanted antitrust event that that person may not be able to prevent.
Research can shed light on subconscious processes such as depression and anxiety – not to mention how we all deal with the flood of information that is a feature of modern life.
“The human brain is not well equipped to deal with the moment of detail,” says lead author Ilya Monosov, PhD, a specialist in neuroscience, neurosurgery and biomedical engineering. She also said that the people are constantly exploring, exploring, exploring stories, and some of that exploration is useless. Our modern lifestyles can reflect the regions in our mind that have changed over millions of years to help us live in an ever-changing and ever-changing environment. The world.
In 2019, studying monkeys, members of the Monosov laboratory J. Work in those areas has encouraged monkeys to gain knowledge of the good things that can happen.
However, it was unclear whether the same circuits were involved in seeking information on highly anticipated events, such as sanctions. After all, most people want to know that, for example, betting on a horse race can pay off. Not so with the bad news.
Monovov said that at the clinic, if you give other patients the opportunity to have a genetic test to find out if they have it, for example, Huntington’s disease, some people will continue to test as soon as possible, while some people refuse to test until symptoms appear. He also said that the doctors see behavior that demands information from other people and intimidating behavior from others.
To find the neural circuits involved in deciding whether to seek information about unacceptable opportunities, the original author Ahmad Jezzini, PhD, and Monosov taught two monkeys to see where something undesirable might happen. Train monkeys to detect signs that they may be experiencing airborne respiration. For example, monkeys were first shown a single sign that told them that an explosion might be coming but with varying degrees of confidence. A few seconds after the display of the first sign, a second sign was displayed that resolved the animal’s uncertainty. He told the monkeys that the meal would definitely come, or not.
Researchers estimate whether these animals want to know what will happen by looking at a second signal or blocking their eyes or, in a separate experiment, allowing monkeys to choose between different symptoms and their effects.
Like humans, the two monkeys had different personalities with bad news: One wanted to know; one prefers dislike. The difference in their attitude toward bad news was remarkable because they shared the same sentiments when it came to good news. When given the opportunity to find out if they would accept something they liked – a drop of juice – they both consistently chose to get it.
“We have found that the tendency to seek information about adverse events can go a long way, even among animals.